Sales forecasting
Forecast Commit Criteria: What Evidence a Deal Needs Before It Counts
Commit is a management claim about a deal, not a CRM stage and not a feeling. This is the evidence standard that makes the claim defensible.
By Onden · Published · 8 min read
Every sales organisation has a Commit category, and almost none of them agree on what it means. In one company it is a stage. In another it is a probability band inherited from a CRM default. In a third it is whatever the regional leader is prepared to defend on the call.
That inconsistency is why forecast conversations turn into negotiations. If Commit has no evidence standard, the only thing being debated is conviction, and conviction is not evidence.
This article sets out what a complex B2B opportunity should be able to demonstrate before it is carried as Commit. Deliberately, it does not attach a universal percentage to the category. Category conventions differ between organisations and CRM configurations, and a number copied from a stage default tells you nothing about the deal underneath it.
Commit is a claim, and claims need support
When a deal is placed in Commit, somebody is telling the business it can plan around that revenue. Hiring, spending and external commitments follow. That is a serious claim, and the standard of support should match.
The useful reframing is this: Commit is not a description of how the deal feels. It is a statement that the conditions required for the customer to buy, in the period stated, are present and evidenced. If the conditions cannot be described, the claim cannot be supported — regardless of how likely the outcome feels.
This also removes the argument about honesty. Nobody is accusing a seller of inflating a number. They are being asked to show the evidence that already justifies the category.
The evidence standard for a Commit deal
Nine conditions cover most complex B2B pursuits. Each should be answerable with something the customer said, did, scheduled or signed.
- Urgency: the customer can articulate the consequence of not deciding, and it is material to them.
- Value: a business case exists in the customer's numbers, and somebody inside the account will defend it.
- Authority: the team has direct access to people who control the budget and the decision, not only reports of their views.
- Champion: the sponsor has demonstrated influence — convened people, spent political capital, argued the case internally.
- Decision process: the steps from recommendation to approval are known and confirmed by the customer, including who signs.
- Commercial path: procurement, security, legal and privacy requirements are identified and, where they gate the date, already underway.
- Timing: the close date is anchored to a buyer-owned event, not a seller target.
- Competition: the position against the incumbent, an internal build, a rival and doing nothing is evidenced rather than assumed.
- Proof and execution: the references, pilots, technical validation or implementation assurances the customer requires have been identified and planned.
Failing one criterion is a reason to inspect, not to downgrade
The point of a standard is to direct attention, not to automate a verdict. A deal that meets eight conditions and has an unmapped procurement path does not need an algorithmic demotion — it needs someone to get the procurement path mapped this week.
Treat each unmet criterion as a management question with an owner and a date. If the gap can be closed inside the forecast period, the deal may legitimately stay in Commit while it is closed. If it cannot, the category is wrong and the honest move is to say so early rather than to discover it at the end of the quarter.
What should never happen is a criterion being waved through because the deal 'feels done'. The whole value of the standard is that it applies to the deals everyone is most confident about.
Why CRM fields are useful but not sufficient
CRM is the system of record and should stay that way. Stage, amount, close date, contacts and activity history are essential, and stage mappings give the organisation a common language.
But a stage records where the seller believes the deal has reached; it does not record why. Two opportunities in the same stage can be structurally different — one with a customer-owned business case and executive access, one with a warm champion and nothing else. The forecast treats them identically.
The gap is closed by inspecting evidence over the top of the record: what is confirmed by the customer, what is seller-supplied, and what remains an assumption. That is a different layer from the CRM, and it is where a readiness diagnostic belongs — describing the evidence in the deal rather than predicting the outcome.
Weak evidence versus strong evidence
The fastest way to make a standard usable is to give managers concrete contrasts.
- Weak: 'They said budget is not an issue.' Strong: 'The finance lead confirmed the project is in the approved capital plan for this half.'
- Weak: 'Our champion loves it.' Strong: 'The champion presented the case to the operations leadership team and asked us for the slide on integration risk.'
- Weak: 'They want it live by the end of the year.' Strong: 'The existing contract expires on 31 March and they have told procurement to run a replacement process by January.'
- Weak: 'We are clearly ahead.' Strong: 'The evaluation lead told us we were shortlisted with one other vendor and named the two criteria that will separate us.'
- Weak: 'They will get back to us.' Strong: 'The customer scheduled the business case review with finance for the 14th and asked us for two inputs beforehand.'
A pre-forecast-call checklist for managers
Before the forecast call, run the Commit list through six checks. It takes minutes per deal and changes what the call is about.
- Does every Commit deal have a buyer-owned timing event on record?
- Which Commit deals have no direct contact with budget authority?
- Which business cases contain no customer-supplied numbers?
- Which deals have no scheduled customer-owned next action?
- Which competitive positions are assumed rather than evidenced?
- Which Commit deals have produced no new evidence since the last call?
What this changes in the forecast meeting
The meeting stops being a defence of numbers and becomes a review of exposure. Instead of asking a seller to justify a percentage, the manager asks which criterion is unmet and what is being done about it this week.
That is also a fairer conversation for sellers. A rep who has done the work can show it. A rep carrying a thin deal gets help rather than pressure, and gets it while there is still time to change the outcome.
If you want to test the standard on a single opportunity before rolling it out, the pipeline-integrity scorecard applies the same evidence logic to one deal in about ten minutes.
Key takeaways
- Commit is a management claim that the conditions to buy are present and evidenced — not a stage or a probability default.
- Nine conditions cover most complex pursuits: urgency, value, authority, champion, process, commercial path, timing, competition and proof.
- An unmet criterion is a trigger for inspection and intervention, not an automatic downgrade.
- CRM records what the organisation believes; the evidence layer tests whether the belief is supported.
Frequently asked questions
What are forecast commit criteria?
Forecast commit criteria are the conditions an opportunity must demonstrably meet before it is carried in the Commit category. In complex B2B sales those conditions cover customer urgency, a customer-owned business case, access to budget and decision authority, champion strength, a confirmed decision and approval process, the commercial path, buyer-owned timing, competitive position and any proof required to remove material risk.
Should Commit be defined as a fixed probability such as 90%?
No. Category conventions differ between organisations and CRM configurations, and a stage-derived percentage says nothing about the evidence inside a specific deal. Defining Commit by the evidence a deal can show is more consistent and more defensible than defining it by a number.
What if a deal fails one commit criterion?
Treat it as a reason to inspect and intervene. Assign the gap to an owner with a date and the specific evidence it should produce. If the gap cannot credibly be closed within the forecast period, the category is wrong and should be changed early.
Is a readiness score the same as a commit decision?
No. A readiness diagnostic describes how well evidenced a pursuit currently is across weighted dimensions. It is not a win probability or a forecast probability, and it does not replace the management judgement involved in categorising a deal.
Test one Commit deal against the evidence
Run a live opportunity through Onden and see which of the nine conditions are evidenced, which are seller-supplied and which are still assumptions.
Analyse a live deal freeContinue reading
The Forecast Truth Gap
Your rep says 90%. Your CRM agrees. Then you lose the deal. Why sales forecasts inherit human bias, and how an evidence diagnostic challenges them.
Sales deal review checklist
A sales deal review checklist of 12 evidence questions for enterprise deals — test urgency, value, stakeholders, decision path, competition and execution.
Deal readiness vs win probability
Win probability forecasts an outcome. Deal readiness diagnoses the pursuit. Understanding the difference changes what a sales team does on a Monday morning.